比较器的传输延迟 在线等
同志们,给小弟出主意啊。
gain,CL
减小L有比较明显改善
Tor=CL/gm. decrease CL or increase gm
you said thai it is bandwidth.
还有其它方面的考虑吗?
As long as your comparator always regenerates from meta-stable point, the time for comparator to solve will 100% depend on CL/gm. However, if you are talking about the logic delay outside the comparator core. It will be another story. If your comparator needs recovery time or your comparator is like OPA-based structure, then please think about that is not the right approach for high speed design.
问题有点大,不过,大概说来,增大电流,减小device尺寸,会提高比较器速度,反之则变慢。但是改变这两个参数,其他许多指标也会变,所以只能取个折衷了。
采用不同的结构,比如OTA,对电容负载比较有效。
yes,you are right.i have solven this problem by taking the postive feedback structure .
ota结构不错,电流型比较器比较速度比较快
学习学习
个人理解,传输时延的减小可以通过提高比较器的输入解决
主要看应用吧!从理论上说,就是增加输入摆幅,结构的话可以选用小尺寸!
申明:网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业解答,请学习本站推出的微波射频专业培训课程。
上一篇:DC-DC和LDO中功率管为何选用P管?
下一篇:求帮忙晶振仿真问题