Dissimilarity in FEM Results of Resonant Patch Antenna

I generally use ADS momentum for circuit design, not used it for Antenna, Iusually use HFSS for antenna.

I was comparing the results of a microstrip resonant patch antenna designed in HFSS with ADS and EMPro (FEM only). But the resonant frequency and return loss value are completely different. I am attaching both the HFSS and ADS workspace.

1. I can't extend the substrate in the X and Y direction independently in FEM simulation setup, it is taking same extension in both X and Y direction.

2. ADS FEM and EMPro FEM (exported from ADS without changing any settings) results aren't matching.

3. Most importantly, the resonant frequency and the corresponding S11 value of HFSS is not matching with ADS.

4. For finite ground structure, with drawn ground plane in cond2 layer, how to simulate it in FEM with rectangular shaped waveport? it looks triangular sheet port. I also tried to use edge port in the cond2 layer coinciding the feed width, but both MoM and FEM is not running.

ADS workspace contains the following

1.patch_MoM=> patch with infinite ground plane, used momentum.

2.patch_fin_gnd_MoM=>patch with finite ground plane (same dimension that I used in HFSS), usedmomentum.

3.patch_FEM=> patch with similar FEM settings and lateral/vertical extensionas HFSS.

=> I exported3.patch_FEMin EMPro and did FEM simulation, but ADS FEM and EMPro FEM is not matching. EMPro FEM result is attached.

4.patch_fin_gnd_FEM => A finite ground plane(same dimension that I used in HFSS) is used, rests are same as 3. lateral extension changed to 0 without touching the vertical extension.

附图/附件

EMPro_patch.png

patch_HFSS.png

patch.png

HFSS_results.jpg

patch_antenna_sim_study.7zads.zip

I am also attaching the measured result and the comparison of all.

附图/附件

all_in_one_comparison.png

VNA_snap.bmp

fabricated_patch.jpg

申明：网友回复良莠不齐，仅供参考。如需专业帮助，请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的ADS视频培训课程。