- 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
Different S-parameters with Ansoft Designer and Agilent ADS
录入:edatop.com 点击:
Hi,
I am simulating the same circuit with Designer and ADS and am not finding the same S-parameters... The core of the model is a 112 ports S-matrix stored in a Touchstone file - the same file is used for both simulations of course, using the S112P_Diff component in ADS and the standard SnP with differential ports in Designer.
My circuit is quite complex and it's possible I messed the design in one of the software, I spent considerable time checking that both models are the same though. In general however, what could explain significant differences (i.e., > few percent) between S-parameter simulations with different software? The ports have to be read in the same order in the SnP file of course, but I am assuming that both Designer and ADS read Touchstone files the same way. What about the model that's used to fit the data - again I doubt it's a problem since I am only plotting the S-parameters on the data point, not in between, but we never know- ? What about issues of non-passivity, return path to ground etc...?
If anyone has experience with this and has suggestions on how to make both simulations agree, other than checking both models again and again - please let me know!
Thanks,
Bastien
I am simulating the same circuit with Designer and ADS and am not finding the same S-parameters... The core of the model is a 112 ports S-matrix stored in a Touchstone file - the same file is used for both simulations of course, using the S112P_Diff component in ADS and the standard SnP with differential ports in Designer.
My circuit is quite complex and it's possible I messed the design in one of the software, I spent considerable time checking that both models are the same though. In general however, what could explain significant differences (i.e., > few percent) between S-parameter simulations with different software? The ports have to be read in the same order in the SnP file of course, but I am assuming that both Designer and ADS read Touchstone files the same way. What about the model that's used to fit the data - again I doubt it's a problem since I am only plotting the S-parameters on the data point, not in between, but we never know- ? What about issues of non-passivity, return path to ground etc...?
If anyone has experience with this and has suggestions on how to make both simulations agree, other than checking both models again and again - please let me know!
Thanks,
Bastien
Hi bastpg,
while working with data files (such as SnP in ADS), interpolation is done by the software to provide as desired result. Kindly check it in ADS and Ansoft Designer, weather interpolation options affects your simulation.
Hope this helps...
申明:网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业帮助,请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的ADS视频培训课程。
上一篇:Eagleware and ADS
下一篇:assign a data file to S(n>pp)P in ADS
ADS培训课程推荐详情>>
国内最全面、最专业的Agilent ADS培训课程,可以帮助您从零开始,全面系统学习ADS设计应用【More..】
- Agilent ADS教学培训课程套装
- 两周学会ADS2011、ADS2013视频教程
- ADS2012、ADS2013射频电路设计详解
- ADS高低阻抗线微带滤波器设计培训教程
- ADS混频器仿真分析实例视频培训课程
- ADS Momentum电磁仿真设计视频课程
- ADS射频电路与通信系统设计高级培训
- ADS Layout和电磁仿真设计培训视频
- ADS Workspace and Simulators Training Course
- ADS Circuit Simulation Training Course
- ADS Layout and EM Simulation Training Course
- Agilent ADS 内部原版培训教材合集