- 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
system level design in ADS_
Butterworth or Chebeshev
regards
vivek
depends on how many elements you want to use.
chebyshev generally has better cutoff, but requires more elements for synthesis.
thanks.
can you describe in brief or can you give me some material on it
regards
the butterwoth is the very flat : with no ripples so if u need very flat filter and no amplitude variations then butterworth is the filter u need but this will cost u more area coz it will need more stages to get the same attenuation as chebychev
chebychev : gives ripples in the amplitude but with low order
khouly
I think it is better judge by your self by comparing the result from both the cases of two filters.
I think it depends on your specification.
Butterworth has flat respond,linear phase,but poor rejection.Chebychev has good rejection ,but ripple in passband.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev_filter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterworth_filter
it is dependent on your requirement. For the same poles,
chebyshev: good selectivity, poor group delay
butterworth: bad selectivity, good group delay
申明:网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业帮助,请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的ADS视频培训课程。
上一篇:Do anyone known to create Design Kits in ADS2008 software?
下一篇:need help from ADS experts
国内最全面、最专业的Agilent ADS培训课程,可以帮助您从零开始,全面系统学习ADS设计应用【More..】
- Agilent ADS教学培训课程套装
- 两周学会ADS2011、ADS2013视频教程
- ADS2012、ADS2013射频电路设计详解
- ADS高低阻抗线微带滤波器设计培训教程
- ADS混频器仿真分析实例视频培训课程
- ADS Momentum电磁仿真设计视频课程
- ADS射频电路与通信系统设计高级培训
- ADS Layout和电磁仿真设计培训视频
- ADS Workspace and Simulators Training Course
- ADS Circuit Simulation Training Course
- ADS Layout and EM Simulation Training Course
- Agilent ADS 内部原版培训教材合集