- 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
Differences between MWO and IE3D simulation
录入：edatop.com 点击：
Hi everybody :
I've designed four prototipes of printed antennas for wireless comunication using Microwave Office and then I've export the designs to IE3D Zeland in order to compare the results, but they were totally different. Then I've built the antennas and the experimentals results are more accurate to the ones using IE3D. Where could be the problem? Maybe any mistake using Microwave or something like that.
Any help will be very useful. Thanks
I've designed four prototipes of printed antennas for wireless comunication using Microwave Office and then I've export the designs to IE3D Zeland in order to compare the results, but they were totally different. Then I've built the antennas and the experimentals results are more accurate to the ones using IE3D. Where could be the problem? Maybe any mistake using Microwave or something like that.
Any help will be very useful. Thanks
first tell which type of simulation u have done using microwave office, if u have done ckt simulation then u will get different results, especially for antennas u should go for full wave 3d em simulation.
Attach/upload your MWO project files (*.emp)...So that I help you what may be the best setup to analyse antennas in Shielded MoM EM simulator....
For your information IE3D is an Unshileded MoM EM Simulator and it is good for Antenna analysis (Radiation applications)...
