- 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
MWS v5 subgridding stability
I woiuld be interested if anyone else has had similar problems.
Regards,
Matt
when I heard that MWS would support subgridding in version 5, I was very excited. But apart from some simple problems, I always ran into stability problems when subgridding was turned on.
Hi guys,
The time domain has an inherent limitation. In order to reduce the time step it needs to refine the grid (and the other way around).
I recommend to test Ansoft HFSS which uses Finite Element Analysis. Not only that it has no refinment problems, but also you can control the accuracy of the convergence process. In practice you can choose if you want a "fast" solution (by specifying 5% accuracy or any other number ) or wait a lttle longer until it converges (to 2% accuracy). In addition you can control how much adaptation it does in each pass (refinment per pass) - to accelerate the convergence.
Regards,
Itai
Thanks :)
We know HFSS... I have to say HFSS fails on some really hard (electrically large) projects I calculated quite easily with MWS.
+ HFSS's (even 9.x) GUI really sucks IMHO
Well let's wait with what improvement on subgridding MWS 5.x will come out
cheers
eirp
try v5.1 beta 2. I have encountered less stability problem with this version.
Element7k
I know about HFSS too, this was not supposed to be another HFSS vs MWS post! They both have their respective place.
I guess it's always the same. The version we want to be using is just over the horizon!
I might give the beta version of v5.1 a try.
Cheers,
Matt
申明:网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业解答,请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的CST视频培训教程。