• 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
首页 > CST > CST使用问答 > transient setting of "accuracy" for cst

transient setting of "accuracy" for cst

录入:edatop.com     点击:
hi everyone...
For the transient setting of the "accuracy" part, is it must be set below -30 dB?if i set it -20dB,how i can know that whether my s parameter is correct or acceptable or not?

thank you.

You can look at the energy balance for a passive device. Also, if you vary the accuracy and you get different results then you probably need to set it to a higher value.

May I know where i can look for that energy balance?and is it you mean that for the correct accuracy, we will get the the same result even we increase the accuracy value?

Sorry I meant power balance - its in the result tree. For passive structure this is less than 1 and if lossless structures, close to 1. If you change the accuracy setting e.g. from -20 to -60 db and there is no significant change in s11 and field data then you should not need to increase the accuracy. The accuracy setting will stop the simulation when energy within the structure has decreased to a level of your desired setting. E.g. it maybe difficult to reach say -60 dB in a highly resonant strucutre.

Power balance?is it the "balance" in the 1D results?and actually what it indicated for.Now i'm designing a tag antenna,but my result is quite different for the -20dB and -30 dB.so mean that -20 dB result is not accurate and i should try increase my accuracy to -40 or -50dB to see whether the result is same or not?

Yes your assumption is correct. -20 dB is insufficent if you result differ between -30 and -20. Yes, I am refereing to the "balance" in 1D result. You can refer to help in CST for a defination of power balance.

really thanks you so much for your help....

申明网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业解答,请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的CST视频培训教程

上一篇:matlab code to CST for spiral antenna
下一篇:defining a resistive strip in CST

CST培训课程推荐详情>>

  网站地图