- 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
CST MWS: Antenna Calculation difference in E-farfield pattern values
录入:edatop.com 点击:
Hi everyone,
I am currently developing software in MATLAB to calculate the S21 parameter based on the E-farfield pattern simulated in CST.
However, MATLAB doesn't calculate the correct S21 values from these farfield patterns.
I read something about Antenna Calculation in the CST design studio handbook (p.93). When applying this AC task (with voltage excitation source of Mag = 1 and Phase = 0) to the already generated farfield patterns, a new farfield is generated [ACx] for each frequency. These farfield pattern values are however much lower than the original ones.
My question is: Why are these values lower? What is the physical interpretation of this AC task?
They don't really explain this in the handbook or online.
Kind regards
Quinten
I am currently developing software in MATLAB to calculate the S21 parameter based on the E-farfield pattern simulated in CST.
However, MATLAB doesn't calculate the correct S21 values from these farfield patterns.
I read something about Antenna Calculation in the CST design studio handbook (p.93). When applying this AC task (with voltage excitation source of Mag = 1 and Phase = 0) to the already generated farfield patterns, a new farfield is generated [ACx] for each frequency. These farfield pattern values are however much lower than the original ones.
My question is: Why are these values lower? What is the physical interpretation of this AC task?
They don't really explain this in the handbook or online.
Kind regards
Quinten
申明:网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业解答,请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的CST视频培训教程。
上一篇:Cst cylindrical design problem
下一篇:Realization LB antenna CST