- 易迪拓培训,专注于微波、射频、天线设计工程师的培养
HFSS Vs CST
I am working on different types of antennas design. Which EM Simulation software( HFSS or CST ) is suitable on which different types of antennas can be designed, accuracy point of view plus how fast, Best simulation results and easy to use. Waiting an early reply.
CST has multiple analysis modules available; you can choose time domain analysis or frequency domain analysis. HFSS is only frequency domain. Thus there may be some extra flexibility with CST, although I find that you need a little more expertise with CST and you need to be thouroughly familiar with EM analysis ( Maxwell's equations and boundary conditions at interfaces). I think HFSS is a little easier to use, but less flexible. If you search elektroda, you'll find a length discussion about these difference. If you are familiar with EM anaysis, then you may be able to make your own choice. Hope this tidbit helped.
regards,
MoonShine
Ping pong!
Why you're creating another topic with this same name?
http://www.elektroda.pl/eboard/searc...ss.html+vs+cst
This topic is closed.
申明:网友回复良莠不齐,仅供参考。如需专业解答,请学习易迪拓培训专家讲授的CST视频培训教程。
上一篇:how to use CST2006's unite cell boundary
下一篇:Looking for tutorial on Particle-In-Cell simulation in CST Particle Studio